Two profile outlines of humans with scientific and artistic images overlaid, symbolic of creativity in science.

While the tools and technologies of science have evolved, the human mind's capacity for creative thought remains the most powerful instrument in the laboratory.

credit: istock.com/ma_rish

Science needs creativity

The pursuit of scientific knowledge relies on analytical thinking, but creativity also plays an essential role.
Allison Whitten
| 3 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
3:00

Test tubes, white coats, microscopes... Many of the objects associated with science evoke an image of a world that is analytical and logical, with scientists following an orderly process to collect and examine data and make conclusions. However, this cliché perception leaves out a crucial scientific ingredient that emerges within the grooves of a scientist’s mind: creativity.

Creative thinking is more commonly associated with the arts, and is underappreciated in science. In today’s fast-paced research environment, success is increasingly measured in quantity over quality: the amount of data and number of papers, grants, citations, and so forth. The call to churn out more and more work isn’t always conducive to a highly creative environment. Yet, prioritizing creativity can itself lead to tangible advances. Many of the most famous scientific discoveries never would have happened without it.

Einstein’s theory of relativity came about through a series of thought experiments in which he pushed the boundaries on new ways to consider time and space. The discovery itself was borne out of creative thinking, specifically a type that has been coined as “janusian thinking” by Albert Rothenberg, a psychiatrist at Harvard Medical School who studies the creative process. The theory describes the creative psychological process in which someone actively and intentionally conceives ideas that are opposite to one other at the same time (1). Later in life, Einstein praised the importance of thinking creatively in science. In 1931, he wrote, “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research” (2).

The invention of the stethoscope offers another example of the payoffs of creativity. In 1816, the physician Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laënnec came up with the idea to roll up a sheet of paper and place it on a patient’s heart. He thought of the idea by recalling a game he had recently observed where children sent sounds to one another across a long tube of wood (3).

Today, fostering creativity in the lab may require decreasing stress and workloads. A recent survey found that 70 percent of scientists feel stressed on an average work day (4). Unfortunately, studies show that stress can decrease creative thinking processes like cognitive flexibility (5). However, scientists may not need to set aside hours of free time to encourage creative thinking. Researchers at the University of California, Santa Barbara showed that working on a nondemanding task and letting the mind wander can lead to more creative solutions when someone returns to the original task (6). University of Pennsylvania researchers showed a similar effect after participants procrastinated on a task by watching funny videos (7).

These results may relate to an incubation period of the creative thinking process where the brain may process the task subconsciously (8). So, taking a break or allowing the mind to wander during a task may lead to a scientific breakthrough.

References

1. Rothenberg, A. Einstein, Bohr, and Creative Thinking in Science. Hist Sci 25, 147–166 (1987).

Continue reading below...
Reliable fluid biomarkers strategies for clinical neuroscience research
WebinarsReliable fluid biomarker strategies for clinical neuroscience research
Explore how validated fluid biomarker assays advance clinical research for neurological diseases.
Read More

2. Einstein, A. & Shaw, G. B. Einstein on Cosmic Religion and Other Opinions and Aphorisms. (Courier Corporation, 2012).

3. Roguin, A. Rene Theophile Hyacinthe Laënnec (1781–1826): The Man Behind the Stethoscope. Clin Med Res 4, 230–235 (2006).

4. Understanding Research Culture: What ... | Wellcome Open Research. at <https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/articles/5-201/v1?src=rss>

5. Vartanian, O., Saint, S. A., Herz, N. & Suedfeld, P. The Creative Brain Under Stress: Considerations for Performance in Extreme Environments. Frontiers in Psychology 11, (2020).

6. Baird, B. et al. Inspired by Distraction: Mind Wandering Facilitates Creative Incubation. Psychol Sci 23, 1117–1122 (2012).

7. Shin, J. & Grant, A. M. When Putting Work Off Pays Off: The Curvilinear Relationship between Procrastination and Creativity. AMJ 64, 772–798 (2021).

8. Ritter, S. M. & Dijksterhuis, A. Creativity—the unconscious foundations of the incubation period. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, (2014).

About the Author

  • Allison Whitten

    Allison Whitten earned her PhD from Vanderbilt University in 2018 and continued her scientific training at Vanderbilt as a National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) Postdoctoral Fellow. Her PhD and postdoctoral studies investigated the neurobiological causes of language impairments in neurological disorders. In 2020, she was awarded an AAAS Mass Media Fellowship to write for Discover Magazine. Her work has also appeared in WIRED, Quanta Magazine, Ars Technica, and more. 

Related Topics

Published In

DDN Magazine May 2024
Volume 20 - Issue 3 | May 2024

May 2024

May 2024 Issue

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...
Subscribe to Newsletter

Subscribe to our eNewsletters

Stay connected with all of the latest from Drug Discovery News.

Subscribe

Sponsored

How new alternative methods are changing drug safety testing.
 Can animal testing be replaced? Discover how scientists are developing more human-relevant ways to predict drug toxicity earlier.
White laboratory mouse standing in a petri dish in a laboratory, illustrating a rodent model commonly used in scientific and preclinical studies.
Learn about common challenges and proper maintenance practices for catheterized rodent models.
Hand reaching toward a glowing AI head icon on a digital network interface with connected tech symbols.
Learn why data quality, governance, and collaboration are critical to realizing AI’s potential across the drug discovery pipeline.
Drug Discovery News December 2025 Issue
Latest IssueVolume 21 • Issue 4 • December 2025

December 2025

December 2025 Issue

Explore this issue