The Mount Sinai study focused on identifying how groups of genes operate in functional clusters or “gene networks” to control communication across distinct areas in the brain or “brain circuits” that are changed in depression.

 

While previous research has suggested that multiple brain regions play a role in depression, how gene activity controls brain circuits has not been investigated, according to Icahn, which noted in a news release about the paper that other studies looked only at how the activity of individual genes is increased or decreased in isolated brain areas in depression without investigating how the relationship between groups of genes is regulated.

 

The current team identified large gene networks that are altered in depression-like states, focusing on three specific genes that were “master regulators” of the gene networks. None of these genes had previously been linked to depression. The team demonstrated that manipulating the master regulator genes that control these networks could make mice susceptible or resilient to chronic stress.

 

“Our study is the first to identify and validate the gene networks at play across brain circuits, showing that manipulating their activity alters the activity of brain cells and ultimately, depression behavior,” said Dr. Rosemary C. Bagot, a postdoctoral researcher in the Nestler Laboratory of Molecular Psychiatry at Mount Sinai. “By considering both activity of individual genes and the relationship between groups of genes in several brain regions, our team found that depression may reflect fundamental changes in the architecture of gene networks, rather than just simple increases or decreases in the activity of genes.”

 

Using a mouse model of human depression, the current research team systematically examined the multifaceted dysregulation of gene networks within several interconnected brain regions implicated in depression: the nucleus accumbens (NAc); the prefrontal cortex; the amygdala and the ventral hippocampus.

 

The brain areas studied form a circuit with the NAc at its center, integrating diverse input from the other three regions to drive motivated behavior. The NAc receives information about executive control and attention from the prefrontal cortex; context, space and emotional data from the ventral hippocampus; and information about both learned associations and emotion from the amygdala.

 

Using RNA sequencing to create a complete picture of gene expression in these interconnected brain regions, the study team found a striking difference in patterns of gene expression between resilient and susceptible mice.

 

Specifically, researchers found an opposing relationship between the prefrontal cortex and the ventral hippocampus. By manipulating master regulators of key gene networks within each of these brain regions, they found a key role for the ventral hippocampus in making mice susceptible to depression, whereas the prefrontal cortex was important in making mice resilient.

 

“Our study is unique in that we took information about coordinated gene networks involved in depression and then actually went back and manipulated these networks within animals to conclusively show that the networks regulate depression-like behavior,” explained Bagot.

 

The research team is now investigating how to target these gene networks with drugs to make mice that are prone to depression more resilient, as a strategy to discover novel, effective treatments for depression in humans.

 

“We don’t fully understand how current antidepressant drugs work and many patients don’t respond well to treatment,” noted Dr. Eric Nestler, Nash Family Professor of Neuroscience and director of the Friedman Brain Institute at Mount Sinai. “The hope is that we can develop more effective treatments by first understanding what is actually happening in the brain in depression. This study’s findings suggest that we need drugs that can alter how clusters of genes function within brain circuits. Depression is a circuit-level disorder and needs to be understood and treated at that level.”