Shifting stem cell regulatory landscape

Because of the significant costs associated with stem cell production scale-up, one of the challenges of clinical development is the potentially crippling effect of late-stage failure and the inability to leverage some of that financial risk by accessing patient populations before the end of Phase 3 studies
| 1 min read
Register for free to listen to this article
Listen with Speechify
0:00
1:00
Because of the significant costs associated with stem cell production scale-up, one of the challenges of clinical development is the potentially crippling effect of late-stage failure and the inability to leverage some of that financial risk by accessing patient populations before the end of Phase 3 studies. There is some hope on the horizon, however, according to Gregory Bonfiglio, founder and managing partner of Proteus Regenerative Medicine, who spoke about recent changes in Japan’s regulations regarding regenerative medicine.
 
Under the new law, announced late last year by the Pharmaceuticals & Medical Devices Agency, if a cell therapy product can show safety and some degree of efficacy in early-phase trials, it can be given a conditional approval, which will allow the product to be brought to market and the company to generate revenues. These revenues can then be used to fund later stage trials that will (hopefully) support final approval and market authorization. A graphic explanation of the new paradigm is available here.
According to Darin Weber, executive vice president of global regulatory affairs at Mesoblast, the new legislation isn’t just about Japan but rather highlights a general convergence in global attitudes about the importance of cell therapies in addressing a growing list of unmet medical needs. At the same time, he doesn’t see the floodgates opening any time soon, but rather expects regulatory bodies to continue to be conservative in their approach to which new therapeutics will get through.
 
Assuming any product remains effective, earlier access to patients should not only relieve some of the financial burden of development directly through revenue generation, but one secondary effect is likely to be increased interest from investors who may begin to see the upside of cell-based therapies rather than simply the promise.

About the Author

Related Topics

Loading Next Article...
Loading Next Article...
Subscribe to Newsletter

Subscribe to our eNewsletters

Stay connected with all of the latest from Drug Discovery News.

Subscribe

Sponsored

Image Alt Text	A laboratorian wearing blue gloves places a PCR sample into a real-time PCR thermocycler, the model shown is blue and white with a large digital screen.
From primer design to sample preparation, explore comprehensive strategies to optimize PCR throughput and reproducibility.
Tackling mycoplasma contamination in biotherapeutic production
DNA-based testing is emerging as a sensitive way to uncover and control a hidden threat in biomanufacturing.
Surface rendering of two interacting proteins (green and peach) bound together by a small molecule ligand at their interface, illustrating a protein-ligand binding event.
Learn how molecular dynamics, AI-aided design, and structural insights combine to reshape how therapeutic proteins are created, validated, and optimized.
Drug Discovery News June 2025 Issue
Latest IssueVolume 21 • Issue 2 • June 2025

June 2025

June 2025 Issue

Explore this issue